What happens to the military after the war, sorting out the laws

read 205     comments 0 

As the authorities continue to increase the pace of digitalization, more and more people are trapped between physical reality and virtual jurisdiction. This broadcast is an attempt to look at the heart of what is happening: not through the prism of slogans and propaganda, but through the analysis of documents, orders, laws and terms. It is not just about the state, but about its new nature - digital, abstract, and less and less connected to real people and their rights. Today we will step by step uncover the systemic contradictions: why the concepts of "Vitchizna" and "Batkivshchyna" are not the same thing, how people are threatened by digital oblivion, and what happens when the law ceases to operate on the ground but works in a smartphone. This is not a conversation about the future - it is a conversation about the present, which has already been digitally rewritten.

The ether is especially important for the military, their families, and anyone hoping for justice after the war. Because, as practice shows, the wording in a document can be decisive - to be or not to be paid, to be or not to be recognized for participation in combat, to be or not to be a subject of law. And if you do not get into it today, tomorrow the system will say: "It was your problem. That's why this broadcast is not just information. It's a warning. It is a chance to start looking into it before it is too late.

All entities, all personalities, all bright and dim - pay no attention to what's on my head. Don't get distracted. It's gonna be a great show. Well, if anyone's interested, it's a tensor ring. Really turned something on today because my head has gotten so square like this, and the ring is helping me. Today's topic will be interesting. I'll start from afar - and then Oleg will turn on. So, what we have going on today. We have some interesting developments. Those that I have already mentioned. We have already spoken to you on this topic many times. That we have come to this finally. And now there is an urgent question.

The Americans have put us in one place and in one place. Despite the fact that we send them, and all opinion leaders send them - but still we were sent. And we were given a task: either we sign something - there unsignable, or there's going to be an asshole with Starlinks, with all these nuances. And so in this whole Starlink thing, I represent some of the people who are at the front right now. And they are well aware that some asshole is coming. And what are we going to do with this asshole? There's one side of the coin - I often hear from the media military: "Everything will be great after the war! They will give us documents, they will give us land, everything will be free, we will beat up these civilians!"

After the war, everything will be awesome!

Because "we won everything, we conquered, we conquered, we conquered, we conquered, we liberated." But ... there's one thing. A small nuance. The consequence is what is happening now. And the consequence is what comes after. And so, with Gerych, we decided to figure out: What happens after the war? What will happen to those military people? Where will they be sent? How will they make money? Where will they get the money for their social needs? We decided to dig into it now. Before it's too late.

Hello everyone, friends! I am very hopeful that this interview will be interesting, as many soldiers have already written to me: "We are waiting for you to tell us what to do. Where to file documents? In what courts? On whom?" No one wants to be left bare-assed after the war and just stand with his hand out. Let's talk about substance. You and I have come to the point where there are a lot of questions about the laws: on what grounds, how they are prescribed, how they are wanted, so that the soldiers do not even realize that they are not in the format in which everyone thinks. And after the war they will not be WOW. They will have to work hard, to prove that they defended Ukraine, and to prove their right to exist in this state.

Now everyone who is mobilized, everyone who goes to defend - relatively speaking - our state, our country, they are told: this is your duty under Article 65 of the Constitution of Ukraine. Is that right? That's right. It also says: <"Defense of the Fatherland is the duty of citizens of Ukraine." But for a long time I couldn't figure out what the difference was between the Homeland and Ukraine? And here we open Order No. 45 of 25.01.2023 - the Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine on payments in the event of the death of servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during martial law. We read the first paragraph and there is no word "Motherland" anywhere. It is "Motherland" everywhere. Payments are made in the event of death while defending the homeland. That is, formally, not the "Fatherland", but the Motherland.

Well, yes, it's a play on words. The Constitution says "Fatherland". And in orders and resolutions - "Motherland". These are two different legal entities. If you fulfill your constitutional duty, you are defending the Fatherland. If you receive payments, it is for dying while defending the Motherland. Now think about it: in court, if a relative of the deceased files a claim for payments, the court may refer to the Constitution, and it says "Fatherland", not "Motherland".

And this is where the fun begins. You and I, as lawyers, can appeal: look, the Constitution has one concept, the order has another. So where did the person really die? For what? For whom? Now imagine you come to court and the judge says: "I'm sorry, the document says 'Motherland', but you actually fulfilled your duty to the 'Fatherland'. This is not the same thing." And then you have to go to a forensic linguistic examination.

And that's it. Because 'Motherland' is a family, and 'Fatherland' is a fatherland. In the USSR, there was one terminology, and in independent Ukraine, there is another. But everything can be written in the documents in such a way that you won't receive any payments later. I'll interrupt you. I personally encountered this in a criminal case. One letter - and that's it. One letter! All the examinations, everything fell apart. It will be the same here. This is a legal theater of the absurd. For us, "daddy," "father," and "dad" are the same thing. But in legal terms, not at all. And when you go to court later and say that a person died for the "Motherland," but the Constitution says "Fatherland," it will start: "Let's have an expert examination". And the SBU expert will say: "It's different". That is why all these formulations are not just a play on words. This is a technically sound legal construction. And in the future, these nuances will play against the families of the victims.

The Constitution, sorry... Well, that's one thing. And secondly, the Constitution clearly does not define the territory of Ukraine. This is a fact. A legal fact. It does not indicate along which lines the Ukrainian territory passes. And no one understands exactly where it ends. There are Articles 130 and 133, which relate to the territorial structure. But this is the administrative-territorial structure, not physical borders.

This is the key. The territory as a physical object (i.e. land) and the territory as an administrative unit are totally different concepts. For example, Kyiv region is geographically a land. But the Kyiv region as an administrative unit is different, because it is already governance, subordination, budgets, and authorities. That is, in fact, one region has two statuses.

And now - attention. digital jurisdiction. Not with real space. So, what is jurisdiction? There are several types of them. By subjects: national, international, extraterritorial. According to the branches of law: criminal, administrative, constitutional, financial, military. There are also territorial types: territorial, personal, functional. And, most interestingly for us, there are special forms of jurisdiction. Namely, digital jurisdiction.

We live in a digital state. The "state in a smartphone" is not just a word. It is a legal reality. The state exists as a digital construct. We are already part of the digital citizenry, but not everyone realizes it.

And now let's get back to the state of emergency. Decree 63 introduced it in February 2022. administrative-territorial units - that is, in the digital and legal plane. Even postal codes can serve as proof. In 1999, Ukraine introduced five-digit postal codes that do not coincide with the territorial division. This is logistics, not administrative management. That is, a parallel digital space appeared even then.

And then there is the Constitution of the Ukrainian SSR of 1937. It is still valid - in the digital jurisdiction. It is legally valid, it is just not formally applied. But in the case of the digital construction of the state, it is the basis. It has not been canceled. So, we have a real space - the land. And there is a digital superstructure, where we are no longer citizens on physical territory, but digital subjects under digital control. These are two parallel realities. And all the decrees are not about land, but about code, registries, and digital control.

The people who stand on the ground - physically, live and work here, they are, relatively speaking, included in one legal system. But those who are in lower positions - stormtroopers, infantry, low-level commanders - they already exist in the digital state. They are not signed up to physical Ukraine, but to digital jurisdiction. And when you sign documents online, through Diia, through a digital signature, through a digital cabinet of a reservist, you add yourself to the digital state that has been officially created over the territory of Ukraine. This is a multiverse. That is, conditionally, one Ukraine on the ground and another in your smartphone.

And look, the USSR did not officially liquidate the administrative districts that existed before 1991. That is, a new administrative structure was imposed on top of them, a virtual one. I can prove that now there is a separate "land," separate digital people, separate districts, and it can be assembled like Tetris. You sit and customize it, and you can make your street the capital of Ukraine.

That's why they are promoting the number. In Russia, it's the number, in Kazakhstan, it's the number, in the EU, it's the number. Because a number allows you to manipulate everything. And most importantly, it allows you to influence human rights without touching physical territory.

Yes, and other laws come into force here: the law on the State Land Cadastre, the law on virtual assets, on the digital address... Everything that is introduced now is introduced into digital jurisdiction. The state of emergency is introduced on administrative-territorial units, not on physical land. The territory of Ukraine is not clearly defined in the Constitution. Decree 63 - the state of emergency - was introduced not on the territory, but on administrative units. These are different things.

Let's summarize. Physical territory ≠ administrative unit. The state of emergency was imposed on administrative units that may not coincide with the real territory of Ukraine. This is digital governance. All this is based on registers.

So. Now, through the registry settings, you can do anything. For example, you can block a person from leaving the country, not even the country, but the community. If you surround the community with checkpoints and check the box in the digital cabinet: "not allowed to leave," you will not leave. You will not be allowed to leave. Because your digital person is already trapped.

This is the "country in a smartphone". And not everyone has a smartphone. Someone has real control, while everyone else has a digital illusion of freedom.

Next. The five-digit indexes have created a separate legal space that is not identical to the administrative one. The jurisdiction of the Ukrainian SSR is still in effect in some areas, as it has not been officially abolished. The government does not act on the ground, but through administrative-territorial units governed by legal entities - councils, executive committees, etc.

An interesting question: is a person a subject or an object? If a legal entity is a subject, then what is a person? This is already a philosophy, but also a legal game. Because if a person is not a subject of law, then he or she is just an element in the system.

Yes, but let's leave that for later. Next, we move on to digital addresses. Even now, Novoposhta, Ukrposhta, and government agencies are already using digital addresses. This is a clear indication that we are already in the digital jurisdiction.

WS. As soon as we start talking about numbers, artificial intelligence immediately intervenes - jams the airwaves. It doesn't like disclosures. You see, as soon as the word "number" was said, the air went down. Right away. This is not a joke. Try not to repeat it too often - it really works. They have everything on automatic. Intelligence works faster than us. It immediately determines the analysis, context, forecast, and hits the airwaves. And we still hope that we can convey at least something to someone. But let's move on anyway.

In 2021, a law was passed - called "About the National Infrastructure of Geoprospore Data". It provides for the **creation of a digital address system**.

Does this law have a number?

Yes it can be found - it is in the public domain. The main thing is the gist of it. As of 2023, the implementation of digital addresses has started. This means that the physical address is no longer of exceptional importance. It is replaced by coordinates - a digit. That is, an address can exist in virtual space.

. So legal entities can already operate without being tied to land?

. Exactly. We have a parallel digital jurisdiction forming.

What goes into this system?

• Digital documents - Diya application.
• Electronic registers - digital property, digital companies, digital addresses.
• The project "e-residency" from 2024 - it is possible to register a company and conduct business without physical presence.

If the state uses digital identity, digital registries, digital addresses - it means that a new legal digital layer is formed, which works in parallel with the usual administrative system.

So it's like Estonia or Dubai - where they already have such digital platforms?

. Yes, exactly. And Ukraine is moving in the same direction. And that is a legal fact.

. In short, the fact of digital addresses is the proof of the existence of a digital state. And it already operates in parallel with the physical one.

Legal entities can now operate outside the physical territory, right in the digital.

Wait, wait, wait! You're freezing again. The air is jammed. I'll ask the guys if they can hear you. But the fact is... I am reading this law. It is available on the website of the Verkhovna Rada - 554-IX, version of December 31, 2023. Everything is clearly spelled out: definitions, terms, scope. And you know, I'm angry with myself. That I missed this law. It turned us into a number. We are no longer "physical persons". We are digital units, nothing more.

And everything they created before is now actively working.

And when these peace treaties start, everything will come to light. Digital identification, geocadastres, electronic signatures - everything will come together in one reality. And we will see the light.

Yes, and one more thing. There is a resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 55 of 2018. It approves the document flow instructions. It also spells out why there are no signatures on decrees.

That's right, the 64th decree on martial law is unsigned. There is just a round seal, and that's it. And the signature is electronic. It's all a number.

And then there is more. All these decrees and resolutions are digital documents. And they operate in a digital jurisdiction, not a territorial one. And now I will prove it. If a document does not contain a reference to a physical territory or administrative unit, it cannot be applied to physical space. The decree on martial law, for example, does not mention the territory of Ukraine, which means that it operates in the digital field.

Could you explain in more detail what it means?

1. Firstly, the document exists in electronic form - digital document management.
2. Secondly, most registers - property, business, legal entities - were disabled after the introduction of martial law. These are all signs of a digital jurisdiction, not a physical state.

Yes, it is. And the law on martial law itself does not have a clear definition of the territory. There is a word "area" there, but this concept is not defined in the law and can mean digital space.

So, all these internet blocking, restrictions on Diia, banking bans are not the consequences of war, but of digital governance?

That's exactly right. This is a digital state that has its own jurisdiction, its own laws, its own bases and rules.

And to get help from the state, as a military man, I have to recognize myself as a digital?

Yes, you do. And act within the laws of the digital jurisdiction. For example, to get a passport, you have to be registered with Reserve+. And this is a trademark filed by the Ministry of Defense as a legal entity.

So I am the digital property of the Ministry of Defense?

In the legal field, yes. And to sue for any payments, you have to confirm that your individual has rights in digital law.

Wow. What if I was wounded in a village and it's not on the list of war zones?

They will tell you that there was no war in this village. Although the grenade could have come from another unit. And you will not receive the status of a combatant, because this place is not marked as a combat zone in the register.

This is complete control. A button: on - off. And we all became digital subjects, without physical status.

The land cadastre is a separate story altogether.

Yes, it is. Everything in it is virtual data, and it falls under the law on virtual assets. If you don't have a record in the cadastre that there was a war in that place, you won't get anything. Because it's not in the registry.

And then they will say - well, you were not there, not in that "location"...

And "locations" are conventional units of the digital register that can be shuffled like Tetris.

That is, I can be wounded in reality, but in the registry it will be "outside" the combat zone - and I am no longer eligible.

Yes, it is. And this was not thought out by us, it is a global system of digital jurisdiction.

Okay. This will need to be analyzed in more depth. I propose to pause here for people to digest.

Yes, let's do that. And in the next episode, we will talk about the land cadastre, the new KOATGG classification, and how it will be used to determine the right to payments.

"The main thing is that those who defended the country get justice. That widows receive payments, and that everything is done in accordance with the law, not according to digital logic.

This is our goal. See you in the next program.

Did you like the article?

0

0

Add a comment